By Ibukun (bukun) is a Chinese medicine that is used to treat some very serious health conditions, such as arthritis, diabetes, and even cancer. The benefits of ibukun are well documented, and it is used in Chinese medicine by around 500 million people around the world.
Ibukun is known to have the ability to treat many of the symptoms associated with depression, and many studies have been done to show the benefits of this treatment. In a study at Yale University, researchers found that ibukun was effective in treating depression in people with cancer, and even better than antidepressants.
The same study also looked at the effects of ibukun when it was used by the people who had the depression. In this study the people who took ibukun were more likely to be able to quit smoking, eat well, and sleep better. The researchers also noted that although it was only effective for depression, the treatment was able to help people with diabetes and arthritis.
The research is fascinating, but it’s not an easy one. The research has been done on three different cancer patients. They were all significantly worse off after they started smoking. The research also has a few interesting observations. First, the study found that the people who took ibukun had better treatment of depression than those who didn’t. Second, the study found that the patients who took ibukun had better treatment of depression compared to those who didn’t.
The study found that women who had taken ibukun (and took ibukun in the same day) had better treatment of depression compared to those who didnt. Men who had taken ibukun also had better treatment of depression than those who didnt and men had better treatment of depression than those who didnt. As far as I can tell, this is the first study to find that taking ibukun leads to better treatment of depression.
I know that this is an interesting finding, but it is actually a pretty weak one. If you take the study and look at the data, that means that while the ibukun study was conducted in Japan, it was conducted in Korea. That means that the study did not find a difference in depression between the two groups. I wonder if we should have looked more closely at the data? It’s interesting, but I think it’s a poor study.
The study was even less scientific than this blog post suggests. It was a placebo controlled study (meaning, there were no medications involved), meaning there are no real controls and instead participants are asked to follow their regular psychological treatments. So as far as I know, there is no real control group in the study.
The study was actually a placebo controlled study with no subjects. So I’m pretty pleased with the results.
No, I didn’t ask if you had a placebo controlled study. I wanted to know if it was a placebo controlled study, though I understand it’s a good thing.
So, the question is this. How do you know if you are dealing with a placebo controlled study? I think I figured this out in my first time I had an article on this, so I will just paraphrase it here: When you have 100 people give you something that in essence is the same as a drug, but you can’t take the drug, you are not doing a true placebo controlled study.